Table of contents:

What is the Difference Between Morality, Morality and Hypocrisy
What is the Difference Between Morality, Morality and Hypocrisy
Anonim

Think carefully before reading morality to someone.

What is the Difference Between Morality, Morality and Hypocrisy
What is the Difference Between Morality, Morality and Hypocrisy

The word "bigotry" carries a negative connotation, but the phenomenon itself is not considered something too bad. At the same time, the hypocrisy of others can greatly affect a person's life. This is proved, for example, by the scandal "We have the right to swimwear, piercings and, God forgive me, sex." Lenta.ru with the dismissal of a teacher who posted a photo in a swimsuit on social networks, or the story of Cherchesov explained why he did not call Dziuba to the national team. "He will stay at home, the situation will close." Fontanka.ru of Artyom Dziuba, suspended from the national football team due to an intimate video leaked to the Internet.

The life hacker finds out what morality is, how it differs from morality and why both should not be confused with hypocrisy.

Why Morality, Morality, and Hypocrisy Must Be Distinguished

First you need to understand the concepts. For example, determine how morality differs from morality. Often these terms are considered morality. Dictionary of Russian synonyms and expressions similar in meaning. M. 1999 are synonymous, but this is not entirely true, although both concepts are studied by philosophers in the framework of a special discipline - ethics.

Morality (from the Latin moralitas) is the moral norms of behavior, relationships with people, as well as morality itself.

Morality, on the other hand, is the inner spiritual qualities that govern a person, ethical norms, rules of behavior determined by these qualities.

Moral laws are established by society, they kind of outline the circle of what a person as a member of society is allowed to do and what is not. Morality includes ideas about good and evil, good and bad, right and wrong, permitted and forbidden, decent and indecent, and so on.

Morality changes with society. It can be both universal and inherent only to a certain group of people: Christian and secular, urban and rural, the morality of the slave and the morality of the slave owner.

Are there any general principles of morality for everyone? Anthropologists from Oxford University, who have compared 60 cultures from around the world, believe there is.

  • Helping relatives (family values).
  • Helping your social group (group values).
  • Mutual assistance.
  • Bravery.
  • Submission to superiors (respect for authorities, elders).
  • Equitable sharing of disputed resources.
  • Respect for property (property rights).

However, the question of the universality of moral principles and, in general, the necessity of their existence is still a matter of debate. Some, like the Australian philosopher John Mackey, believe that morality should be abandoned altogether. Because, according to Mackey, it is an artificial, human-made abstraction, with the help of which those in power manipulate the minds of the majority.

Unlike moral principles, a person forms moral norms in himself independently. These can be both their own views and attitudes learned from the surrounding reality (both related to morality and not dependent on it).

Simply put, morality is a standard of behavior formed “outside” a person, and morality is “inside” him.

You can not correspond to public ideas about morality, but at the same time remain a moral person. But on the contrary, it no longer works. A person cannot be considered a highly moral person if he does not share the values of society within himself (at the moral level). This doublethink is just characteristic of bigots.

A hypocrite is a person who hypocritically disguises himself with ostentatious virtue. Synonyms here can be Bigotry. Dictionary of Russian synonyms and expressions similar in meaning. M.1999 to name duplicity, doublethink, hypocrisy and hypocrisy.

Although moral and ethical principles are relative, they are only indirectly related to bigotry. A prude, in contrast to a moral person, uses norms to achieve his goals, demands their fulfillment from others, but considers them optional for himself. He is inconsistent and limited, breeds lies, obscures the truth, manipulates people and condemns those who are not like him, secretly despising everyone except himself.

The most unpleasant thing is that to some extent a prude lives in almost all of us.

What signs distinguish a prude from a moral person

Demonstrative behavior

High moral standards and strict moral principles are needed by hypocrites not in order to live in accordance with the ideas of justice, good and evil. Their main goal is to show themselves in the best possible light, emphasizing their exclusivity and superiority. In this they are helped by the demonstrativeness of the "virtues" shown.

So, prudes can reproach people with low wages or obesity, saying that they themselves are to blame for their problems. At the same time, the bigots themselves could never face either need or overweight. This kind of “Here I am …” statements are often referred to as the white coat phenomenon.

Formal perception of postulated norms

Demonstration of behavior is directly related to the formalism of hypocrites in relation to norms and rules. Without understanding their essence, such people blindly follow the established canons. For example, a formalist teacher will require students not to understand the meaning of a paragraph, but to memorize it, not to show creativity and originality, but to comply with absurdly specific rules.

The norm for a bigot is a reason to hang labels on others. At the same time, the inner content hidden behind them does not bother him much. For example, if people cohabit without marrying, it means that they are libertines. The hype doesn't care that the couple can be happy with everything, and some unregistered relationships are much happier than the official ones.

Double standarts

There is another side to the prude formalism. What they demand from others may be considered optional for themselves. For example, while condemning the violence in video games and films that allegedly spoil the psyche of teenagers, the prude is happy to consume the same content and does not see anything wrong with it.

The vagueness and ambiguity of concepts such as morality, spirituality, justice, honesty, decency, creates fertile ground for sanctimonious insinuations. This, coupled with demagoguery, allows you to interpret any events and actions in your favor, talk about your own positive qualities, but deny them to other people.

A prude can condemn girls in "too open" clothes on the street, but at the same time admire candid photos on the Internet; condemn swearing, but use foul language, explaining this with their own reasons. This behavior is most eloquently described by the meme “You don’t understand, this is different!”.

Assessment bias and extremes

The hypocrites' favorite business is to arrange Huseynov A. A., Apresyan R. G. Ethics: Textbook. M. 2000 moral courts. Confidence in one's own infallibility largely contributes to the aggressiveness of such attacks, in fact, caused more by envy and complexes than by the desire for the best.

In this regard, value judgments and emotionally colored expressions without any confirmation by facts are common for such people. Any attempt to question their arguments will inevitably cause anger and, probably, even insults, and all because the bigot puts himself and his opinion above others.

The question of what is more important - morality or ethics, remains controversial. However, it is becoming more and more obvious that people perceive the world around them in completely different ways. What is absolutely unacceptable for some is an ordinary norm for others. Therefore, back to the very first thought of this article: think carefully before reading morality to someone.

Recommended: